Today's Annoyance

It started with a phone call. You know the kind--one of those automated ones. The kind you usually hang up on as soon as you realize what it is.

This particular one was from my insurance company's pharmacy provider. So I thought I'd listen to the message.

"Your mail-order prescription has been processed. We must speak to you before it can be shipped. Please call us at 1-800, blah-blah-blah, blah-blah-blah-blah. Would you like me to repeat that number?"


As soon as the message got to the "please call us" part, I was looking around for a pen and paper to write the number down. I couldn't find one, so I thought I'd try stalling for time.

"Yes, please repeat the number."

"Please call us at 1-800, blah-blah-blah, blah-blah-blah-blah. Would you like me to repeat that number?"


No pencil in the drawers, no pencils in the pencil cup. I thought I'd better keep stalling for time.

"Yeah, repeat the number!"

"Please call us at 1-800, blah-blah-blah, blah-blah-blah-blah. Would you like me to repeat that number?"

No pencil in any drawers where they should be. My pulse was beginning to race.

"Yeah, yeah, the number, repeat the number!"

"Please call us at 1-800, blah-blah-blah, blah-blah-blah-blah. Would you like me to repeat that number?"


No sharp objects with which to draw blood so I could scrawl the number onto the wall, desk, or anyplace. I knew I was beaten.

"No, thank you," I replied in defeat.

"Thank you for using our services. Goodbye!"


Upon reflection, I am force to wonder at the logic behind the design that gave birth to this scenario. Here are the most important facts, as I see them:


  • The pharmacy wanted me to call them about the prescription.
  • The pharmacy called me to tell me to call them.
  • I was on the phone, listening to the message from the pharmacy.
  • The message told me the number to call.
  • The message repeated the number when I asked for it.

So why in the name of all that is good and right in the world, couldn't the message give me this option?

"Would you like to speak to a representative about your order?"

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Genealogy. It's all Relative

Genealogy is a pursuit where you'll never know what you may turn up. Or the fascinating things that drop in your lap. Some people approach genealogy wanting to prove some old family legend. Some just are curious about how their family got to where it is. And others, well, some others want to see what they can get from someone. Once upon a time, not very long ago, a man came in to the Family History Library and wanted to trace the descendants of a European royal (any royal, pick one -- no kidding!) to see if he was a descendant. We explained it was easier to go backwards from your self and see where you connect up. He didn't like that answer, and I don't think he ever came back. Someone once said the easiest way to trace your family history is to run for office. There's a lot of truth in that old chestnut. So the other day I was glancing through the online Deseret News and noticed an article about Mitt Romney and his LDS roots. As I was reading the article, I cam
Read more

What's In A Name?

In this case, nothing really. It's just that TBWAIN is more interesting than Jeff Svare's Blog . The content isn't going to change, 'cuz it's my blog. But the name was dull. Boring. Unimaginative. And, I was tired of it. Next week, I'm going to the Computers in Libraries Conference in Washington, D.C. It's always a great conference, and I feel really fortunate that I'm able to go again. It's a real idea factory, and I always come away recharged with new ideas. This year I'm hoping to get a chance to further discuss content management ideas for libraries and information organizations. The unofficial wiki for the conference has some good stuff posted. Lots of seasoned conference-goers have shared their insights on how to help your conference experience be a great one.
Read more

The Top 40 Twins of All Time

No, this list doesn't include the two I know in Wisconsin. :-) Over at Aaron Gleeman's Blog he's working on a list of the top 40 Minnesota Twins. Since it's just plays who wore a Twins uniform, and only their performance as a Twins counts, you won't see Jack Morris or Walter Johnson on the list. The list starts with Randy Bush as #40. I wonder where Harmon Killebrew , Tony Oliva , Bert Blyleven , and Jim Kaat will finish up. I'll be paying attention to his list.
Read more